再用官方例程去调试硬件定时器的时候,发现延时5s后在回调函数里面调用rt_tick_get()不准确,这是怎么回事啊
static rt_err_t timeout_cb(rt_device_t dev, rt_size_t size)
{
rt_kprintf("this is hwtimer timeout callback fucntion!\n");
rt_kprintf("tick is :%d !\n", rt_tick_get());
return 0;
}
static int hwtimer_sample(int argc, char *argv[])
{
rt_err_t ret = RT_EOK;
rt_hwtimerval_t timeout_s; /* 定时器超时值 */
rt_device_t hw_dev = RT_NULL; /* 定时器设备句柄 */
rt_hwtimer_mode_t mode; /* 定时器模式 */
/* 查找定时器设备 */
hw_dev = rt_device_find(HWTIMER_DEV_NAME);
if (hw_dev == RT_NULL)
{
rt_kprintf("hwtimer sample run failed! can't find %s device!\n", HWTIMER_DEV_NAME);
return RT_ERROR;
}
/* 以读写方式打开设备 */
ret = rt_device_open(hw_dev, RT_DEVICE_OFLAG_RDWR);
if (ret != RT_EOK)
{
rt_kprintf("open %s device failed!\n", HWTIMER_DEV_NAME);
return ret;
}
/* 设置超时回调函数 */
rt_device_set_rx_indicate(hw_dev, timeout_cb);
/* 设置模式为周期性定时器 */
mode = HWTIMER_MODE_PERIOD;
ret = rt_device_control(hw_dev, HWTIMER_CTRL_MODE_SET, &mode);
if (ret != RT_EOK)
{
rt_kprintf("set mode failed! ret is :%d\n", ret);
return ret;
}
/* 设置定时器超时值为5s并启动定时器 */
timeout_s.sec = 5; /* 秒 */
timeout_s.usec = 0; /* 微秒 */
if (rt_device_write(hw_dev, 0, &timeout_s, sizeof(timeout_s)) != sizeof(timeout_s))
{
rt_kprintf("set timeout value failed\n");
return RT_ERROR;
}
/* 延时3500ms */
rt_thread_mdelay(3500);
/* 读取定时器当前值 */
rt_device_read(hw_dev, 0, &timeout_s, sizeof(timeout_s));
rt_kprintf("Read: Sec = %d, Usec = %d\n", timeout_s.sec, timeout_s.usec);
return ret;
调试的结果:
Read: Sec = 3, Usec = 499387
msh />this is hwtimer timeout callback fucntion!
tick is :38289 !
this is hwtimer timeout callback fucntion!
tick is :43284 !
this is hwtimer timeout callback fucntion!
tick is :48279 !
this is hwtimer timeout callback fucntion!
tick is :53274 !
this is hwtimer timeout callback fucntion!
tick is :58269 !
估计楼主搞混了tick值和时间值的关系,
按照你的系统搭配置,应该1tick=1ms,也就是1000个tick=1S
正确评估定时器的定时是否精确的方法:
1.在启动定时器前rt_tick_get取一下当前的tick0值;
2.每一次定时器超时回调的时候取一下tickn值;
3.分别计算出: tick1-tick0,tick2-tick1,以此类推;
4.根据1tick与1s的换算关系,对步骤3的差值进行比较;
5。得出比较结论。
如果你不像做tick与时间的换算,你可以考虑使用rt_tick_get_millisecond代替rt_tick_get。
仔细帮你查看了一下dr_hwtimer.c里面的代码,
如果5tick是你觉得疑惑的地方,你可以追踪一下dr_hwtimer.c里面的如何把5s转换成tick的地方,并且打印出来看下,最后设置的是否是5000还是4995. 以我的经验来看,应该是在clock放大和乘积的时候,有一些地方精读的丢失。具体由于不知道你的时钟是多少,所以你可以自己找到root cause。
{
prescaler_value = (uint32_t)(HAL_RCC_GetPCLK1Freq() * pclk1_doubler / 10000) - 1;
}
tim->Init.Period = 10000 - 1;
tim->Init.Prescaler = prescaler_value;
tim->Init.ClockDivision = TIM_CLOCKDIVISION_DIV1;
系统并不是简单的把5s*1000转换成ticks。而是需要根据1s有多少ticks,然后根据你的主频时钟来计算5s有多少ticks
但是我用ENV配置工具从新配置一下,用keil编译那个官方例程,出来的就是正确的
`
[09:39:54.343]收←◆this is hwtimer timeout callback fucntion!
tick is :47895 !
[09:39:59.325]收←◆this is hwtimer timeout callback fucntion!
tick is :52895 !
[09:40:04.322]收←◆this is hwtimer timeout callback fucntion!
tick is :57895 !
[09:40:09.343]收←◆this is hwtimer timeout callback fucntion!
tick is :62895 !
[09:40:14.324]收←◆this is hwtimer timeout callback fucntion!
tick is :67895 !
[09:40:19.343]收←◆this is hwtimer timeout callback fucntion!
tick is :72895 !
[09:40:24.324]收←◆this is hwtimer timeout callback fucntion!
tick is :77895 !
解决了吗?楼主 我也遇到相同的问题